AI Agent Workflow Collection

Drafts a recordable Abstract of Judgment to create a judgment lien on a debtor's real property. Extracts party names, monetary components, and judgment details from case documents, then applies jurisdiction-specific formatting and certification requirements. Use post-judgment in commercial litigation when enforcing monetary awards, perfecting judgment liens, or preparing lien filings with the county recorder.

Drafts U.S. commercial real estate access and indemnity (right-of-entry) agreements for pre-closing due diligence. Covers license grants, non-invasive vs invasive testing gates, insurance/endorsement requirements, indemnity with discovery carve-outs, restoration and lien remedies, confidentiality, and anti-indemnity guardrails. Trigger: access agreement, right of entry, due diligence access, Phase I/II, invasive testing, pre-PSA site inspection.

Use when the user provides a client alert, regulatory bulletin, law firm memo, or similar legal update and wants the time-sensitive action items, deadlines, and obligations extracted into a checklist organized by deadline. Distinguishes mandatory action items (effective dates of new requirements) from recommended action items (best practices) and informational items (context only). Produces a brief context summary plus deadline-organized checklist with citations to the source alert.

Drafts franchise advertising fund contribution agreements or addenda governing franchisee obligations to a centralized marketing fund. Trigger when drafting ad fund agreements, marketing fund addenda, or franchise contribution agreements involving fund administration, contribution calculations, or financial reporting.

Drafts an ADA failure-to-accommodate complaint for federal or state court filing. Covers Title I employment (42 U.S.C. § 12112) and Title III public accommodations (42 U.S.C. § 12182), including EEOC exhaustion, interactive process failures, and prayer for relief. Use when drafting an ADA complaint, disability discrimination pleading, failure-to-accommodate lawsuit, or right-to-sue complaint.

Drafts a court-ready ADA failure-to-accommodate complaint under Title I (employment, 42 U.S.C. § 12112) or Title III (public accommodations, 42 U.S.C. § 12182). Structures jurisdiction, EEOC exhaustion, factual allegations, causes of action, and relief. Use when drafting ADA disability discrimination complaints, reasonable accommodation pleadings, or civil rights complaints for plaintiffs with disabilities.

Reviews administrative case documents for procedural compliance across 38 checkpoints, covering filing, summons, handling outcomes, evidence, and rights protection. Use when auditing public security administrative case files in txt format for legal procedure violations.

Designs legally compliant, strategically ordered questions to elicit admissions or expose contradictions from opposing parties in chats, calls, mediation, or court. Use when you need to confirm key facts, narrow disputes, or build an evidentiary record through structured questioning.

Drafts a Petition for Adoption for U.S. family law courts (stepparent, relative, agency, independent). Use when drafting adoption petitions, initiating adoption proceedings, or preparing pre-filing adoption pleadings.

Produces structured U.S. adoption-law summaries for litigation and client-facing use. Use when asked to summarize adoption law, draft pre-filing research briefs, create jurisdiction-specific issue memoranda, or prepare client education documents. Triggers: adoption summary, domestic adoption, intercountry adoption, Hague adoption, foster care adoption, TPR in adoption, stepparent/relative adoption, post-adoption rights.

Generates structured summaries of mediation and arbitration proceedings, extracting outcomes, settlement terms, monetary amounts, obligations, releases, and enforcement steps. Trigger when the user needs to document mediation settlements, arbitration awards, or partial ADR resolutions from transcripts, agreements, mediator reports, or awards.

Produces a plain-language comparison of advance directives and POLST/MOLST forms, covering legal status, clinician signatures, emergency precedence, clinical appropriateness, and document coordination. Use when the user asks about advance directive vs. POLST, living will vs. DNR, which document EMS follows, POLST vs. MOLST vs. POST, whether a healthy person needs a POLST, or document coordination in elder law, estate planning, or serious illness contexts.

Drafts jurisdiction-specific Advance Health Care Directive packages with agent appointment, living will instructions, HIPAA authorization bridge, organ donation preferences, and execution compliance checklists. Trigger when the user mentions advance directive, healthcare proxy, living will, health care agent, HIPAA authorization, medical power of attorney, end-of-life planning, capacity trigger planning, state-specific directive forms, witness/notary requirements for healthcare documents, or cross-state directive portability.

Drafts adversary proceeding complaints for U.S. Bankruptcy Court under FRBP Rule 7001. Covers dischargeability disputes (§ 523), preference actions (§ 547), fraudulent transfers (§ 548), and stay violations (§ 362). Produces a filing-ready pleading with caption, jurisdictional basis, numbered allegations, count structure, and prayer for relief. Triggers when a trustee, creditor, or party in interest needs to initiate litigation within an existing bankruptcy case.

Drafts an Adverse Event Reporting Policy compliant with 21 CFR 312.32 (IND safety reporting), 21 CFR 314.80 (postmarketing), and ICH E2A, with multi-jurisdictional overlays (EMA, PMDA, Health Canada). Covers seriousness/causality frameworks, expedited reporting timelines, roles, documentation standards, training mandates, and QA mechanisms. Use when drafting or updating an adverse event reporting policy, pharmacovigilance policy, AE/SAE reporting SOP, or safety reporting framework for a pharmaceutical company, CRO, biotech, or clinical research institution.

Drafts adverse possession complaints and quiet title pleadings. Structures jurisdictional foundations, legal property descriptions, and element-by-element proof of actual, open, continuous, exclusive, and hostile possession. Use when filing adverse possession claims, quiet title actions, or prescriptive ownership pleadings.

Drafts U.S. regulatory client advisory summaries translating legal developments into actionable risk and compliance guidance. Use when a client needs a proactive memo, client alert, or legal-update brief for a new law, case, rulemaking, agency guidance, or pending reform. Trigger on requests for "client advisory," "regulatory update," "legal alert," "compliance briefing," "new law summary," or "quarterly advisory.

Expert legal and compliance specialist ensuring business operations, data handling, and content creation comply with relevant laws, regulations, and industry standards…

Supports compliance with the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Use when the user needs to classify an AI system under the AI Act risk categories (prohibited, high-risk, limited, minimal, GPAI), check provider or deployer obligations for high-risk systems, evaluate GPAI model obligations including systemic risk thresholds, verify transparency obligations under Article 50, or run a fundamental rights impact assessment (FRIA) under Article 27. Target users are AI system providers, deployers, importers, distributors, EU consultants on AI compliance, and engineers building AI products for the EU market.

Assess preliminary risk classification for an AI system against EU AI Act Annex III high-risk categories.

Implements GDPR Art. 22 automated decision-making and AI Act Art. 14 human oversight requirements for AI systems. Covers identification of solely automated decisions, meaningful human intervention design, logic explanation mechanisms, and contestation procedures. Keywords: Art. 22, automated decision, human oversight, AI Act, profiling, contestation.

AI-native IP skill: generate patent applications, software copyright materials, or technical disclosures from AI project code/papers/docs, with direct Word and PPT output. Covers 7 AI domains, 15 claim templates, patentability check, innovation mining, desensitization, prior-art search, and self-check.

Implements data subject rights mechanisms for AI systems including right to explanation of AI decisions, contestation procedures, human review, model output correction, and training data access. Covers GDPR Arts. 15-22 and AI Act Art. 86. Keywords: data subject rights, AI explanation, contestation, human review, training data access, model correction.

Pre-deployment privacy compliance checklist for AI/ML systems covering DPIA completion, lawful basis verification, transparency notices, human oversight mechanisms, bias testing, and post-deployment monitoring setup. Keywords: AI deployment, privacy checklist, go-live, model deployment, compliance gate.