Read-only delegate to cursor-agent (Composer) for questions, investigation, design discussion, and adversarial sanity checks. No worktree, no cherry-pick, no Lead diff review — cursor-agent is locked to ask mode and cannot write. Use when user says: ask cursor, cursor sanity check, get a second opinion, adversarial review, design discussion, investigate with cursor, cursor:ask. Do NOT load for: implementation, refactor, file edits, commit/push work, anything requiring write access (use cursor:do or breezing --cursor instead).
EnglishDelegate a single write task to Cursor Composer via cursor-companion.sh inside an isolated worktree, then Lead-review the diff and cherry-pick. Use when user invokes cursor:do, says delegate to cursor, have composer write it, refactor with cursor, hand a file edit to Composer. Do NOT load for: planning, code review only, read-only investigation, or multi-task team runs (use breezing --cursor or cursor:ask instead).
EnglishRun a Cursor Composer review as an advisory second opinion while keeping the primary review verdict on the host brain. Use when user invokes cursor:review, asks Cursor to review, or wants composer to sanity-check a diff. Cursor never owns APPROVE/REQUESTCHANGES.
EnglishExtract recurring failure patterns from breezing orchestration logs and Judgment Ledger, emit failure-rule.v1 proposals with confidence scores. SSOT promotion to patterns.md or decisions.md is proposal-only — human-approval-required. Use when user mentions failure codifier, failure patterns, self-learning loop, codify failures, or failure-rule proposals. Do NOT load for: direct SSOT edits, auto-promotion, or implementation unrelated to failure analysis.
EnglishGenerate an Acceptance Demo HTML for non-engineer vibecoders right before ship/wait/reject decision. Reads back the acceptancecriteria that were stored as personal-preference.v1 by harness-plan-brief (joined by userrequesthash), then renders a single-file HTML showing each criterion as verified or unverified along with a ship/wait/reject recommendation. Use when the user asks for an acceptance review, wants to decide whether to ship a delivered task, or says: acceptance demo, accept demo, 受け入れ判断, 受入レビュー, ship/wait/reject 判定, 検収レビュー. Do NOT load for: implementation, code review, release work.
EnglishGenerate a Plan Brief HTML for non-engineer vibecoders before implementation starts. Searches harness-mem (project-only) for relevant past decisions, patterns, and Plans archive entries, then renders a single-file HTML artifact summarizing understanding, options, risks, acceptance criteria, and confidence. Use when the user requests a planning preview, a non-engineer-friendly summary before approval, or says: plan brief, planning preview, 計画概要, 計画レビュー. Do NOT load for: actual implementation, code review, release work.
EnglishMulti-perspective review supporting code, plan, and scope analysis. Auto-detects review type from context. Use when user mentions reviews, code review, plan review, scope analysis, security, performance, quality checks, PRs, diffs, or change review. Do NOT load for: implementation work, new feature development, bug fixes, or setup.
EnglishInternal skill for harness-work phase boundary management. Auto-triggered by orchestration.
EnglishProvides guidance on Cursor ↔ Claude Code 2-agent workflow. Use when user mentions ワークフローについて, Cursorとの連携, 作業の流れ, 2-agent workflow, collaboration. Do NOT load for: 実装作業, ワークフロー設定, ハンドオフ実行.
Japanese
AGENT SKILLS ATLASIncludes Cursor Ask, Cursor Review, Failure Codifier, and other workflows.
Claude Code
Codex
Cursor
GitHub Copilot
Gemini CLISupported by the Atlas install prompt. Skill-specific requirements vary.
Pack stats
What’s included
Cursor Ask
Read-only delegate to cursor-agent (Composer) for questions, investigation, design discussion, and adversarial sanity checks. No worktree, no cherry-pick, no Lead diff review — cursor-agent is locked to ask mode and cannot write. Use when user says: ask cursor, cursor sanity check, get a second opinion, adversarial review, design discussion, investigate with cursor, cursor:ask. Do NOT load for: implementation, refactor, file edits, commit/push work, anything requiring write access (use cursor:do or breezing --cursor instead).
Cursor Do
Delegate a single write task to Cursor Composer via cursor-companion.sh inside an isolated worktree, then Lead-review the diff and cherry-pick. Use when user invokes cursor:do, says delegate to cursor, have composer write it, refactor with cursor, hand a file edit to Composer. Do NOT load for: planning, code review only, read-only investigation, or multi-task team runs (use breezing --cursor or cursor:ask instead).
Cursor Review
Run a Cursor Composer review as an advisory second opinion while keeping the primary review verdict on the host brain. Use when user invokes cursor:review, asks Cursor to review, or wants composer to sanity-check a diff. Cursor never owns APPROVE/REQUESTCHANGES.
Failure Codifier
Extract recurring failure patterns from breezing orchestration logs and Judgment Ledger, emit failure-rule.v1 proposals with confidence scores. SSOT promotion to patterns.md or decisions.md is proposal-only — human-approval-required. Use when user mentions failure codifier, failure patterns, self-learning loop, codify failures, or failure-rule proposals. Do NOT load for: direct SSOT edits, auto-promotion, or implementation unrelated to failure analysis.
Harness Accept
Generate an Acceptance Demo HTML for non-engineer vibecoders right before ship/wait/reject decision. Reads back the acceptancecriteria that were stored as personal-preference.v1 by harness-plan-brief (joined by userrequesthash), then renders a single-file HTML showing each criterion as verified or unverified along with a ship/wait/reject recommendation. Use when the user asks for an acceptance review, wants to decide whether to ship a delivered task, or says: acceptance demo, accept demo, 受け入れ判断, 受入レビュー, ship/wait/reject 判定, 検収レビュー. Do NOT load for: implementation, code review, release work.
Harness Plan Brief
Generate a Plan Brief HTML for non-engineer vibecoders before implementation starts. Searches harness-mem (project-only) for relevant past decisions, patterns, and Plans archive entries, then renders a single-file HTML artifact summarizing understanding, options, risks, acceptance criteria, and confidence. Use when the user requests a planning preview, a non-engineer-friendly summary before approval, or says: plan brief, planning preview, 計画概要, 計画レビュー. Do NOT load for: actual implementation, code review, release work.
Harness Review
Multi-perspective review supporting code, plan, and scope analysis. Auto-detects review type from context. Use when user mentions reviews, code review, plan review, scope analysis, security, performance, quality checks, PRs, diffs, or change review. Do NOT load for: implementation work, new feature development, bug fixes, or setup.
Session State
Internal skill for harness-work phase boundary management. Auto-triggered by orchestration.
Workflow Guide
Provides guidance on Cursor ↔ Claude Code 2-agent workflow. Use when user mentions ワークフローについて, Cursorとの連携, 作業の流れ, 2-agent workflow, collaboration. Do NOT load for: 実装作業, ワークフロー設定, ハンドオフ実行.
Quick start
- Choose your skills. Select individual skills above, or choose the entire pack.
- Copy the install prompt. Use Copy install prompt above the list.
- Send it to your agent. Paste into your coding agent’s chat. Your agent reviews the source and guides the setup.
Try it with your agent
After installation, start with a request like:
Use the Cursor Ask skill to help with my task.
Ask me for the context you need before getting started.Requirements & license
- A coding agent that can access your project files and install skills.
- Your agent checks each skill’s instructions, dependencies, and permissions during setup.
- Reported license for the skills shown: MIT. The author’s terms apply.