Use when authoring evals/predicates (Scout, TDD-Engineer), framing an audit (Auditor), or justifying which phases run (PhaseAdvisor/router). Codifies Google's 4-phase adversarial-testing methodology mapped onto evolve-loop's eval, audit, routing, and red-team surfaces.
EnglishUse when reviewing code changes for quality, security, performance, or maintainability issues and identifying simplification opportunities in a single token-efficient…
EnglishUse after evolve-build has produced build-report.md. Validates the build via four parallel sub-auditors (eval-replay, lint, regression, build-quality) and produces ALL-PASS verdict. Adversarial mode default-on per CLAUDE.md.
EnglishUse after evolve-tdd has written RED tests and the contract is in team-context.md. Implements the minimum code to turn RED tests GREEN. Runs in a worktree with single-writer invariant.
EnglishPre-Scout intent capture phase. Structures vague user goals into intent.md before any subagent budget is spent. Opt-in via EVOLVEREQUIREINTENT=1.
EnglishUse when the user invokes /evolve-loop or asks to run autonomous improvement cycles, self-evolving development, compound discovery, or multi-cycle code improvement with research, build, audit, and learning…
EnglishUse when scout-report.md exists and TDD/Build hasn't started yet. Runs four lenses (CEO, Eng, Design, Security) in parallel on the task list and produces a verdict (PROCEED, REVISE, ABORT) before code is written. Catches misaligned plans before they cost cycles.
EnglishUse after evolve-ship completes. Three sub-reflectors (instinct, gene, failure) run in parallel to extract lessons, update gene pool, and analyze any failures. Off the latency-critical path.
EnglishUse after evolve-audit returns Verdict PASS. Atomic git commit + tag + ledger update. Single-writer; cannot fan-out.
EnglishUse when starting a new evolve-loop cycle and the cycle goal is ambiguous or only described as a one-line objective. Generates a structured specification before any code is written. Surfaces assumptions explicitly.
EnglishUse when the plan-review verdict is PROCEED (or plan-review is disabled) and code has not yet been written. Writes RED tests first, defining the contract Builder must satisfy. The mandatory hop before any implementation.
EnglishUse when reviewing Go test code (new or changed test.go files, test harnesses, fixtures, or test tooling) for a Go-test-expert pass — behavior-over-surface, determinism, parallel-safety, build-tag correctness, and harness reuse. Complements the general code-reviewer with test-specific rigor.
EnglishUse when the user invokes /inspirer or asks to brainstorm creatively, think outside the box, explore unconventional approaches, break out of stagnation, or generate research-backed ideas with provocation…
EnglishUse when the user (or the advisor) wants to design and register a NEW optional pipeline phase conversationally — "add a phase that does X". Interviews for goal-type, trigger signal, report sections, and verdict; synthesizes a phase.json + persona; registers them via evolve phases create; self-corrects from the command's JSON envelope. The Go binary is the single enforcement point, so this flow works from any LLM CLI.
EnglishSecurity-focused code review that emits a numeric composite score (0.0–1.0) suitable for the evolve-loop Builder self-review convergence…
EnglishUse when the user invokes /verify-release or asks to check whether a release has propagated, whether the marketplace is up to date, or whether installed plugins reflect the latest version. Wraps scripts/release/marketplace-poll.sh for standalone post-publish verification.
EnglishIncludes Adversarial Testing, Code Review Simplify, Evolve Audit, and other workflows.
Supported by the Atlas install prompt. Skill-specific requirements vary.
Pack stats
What’s included
Adversarial Testing
Use when authoring evals/predicates (Scout, TDD-Engineer), framing an audit (Auditor), or justifying which phases run (PhaseAdvisor/router). Codifies Google's 4-phase adversarial-testing methodology mapped onto evolve-loop's eval, audit, routing, and red-team surfaces.
Code Review Simplify
Use when reviewing code changes for quality, security, performance, or maintainability issues and identifying simplification opportunities in a single token-efficient pass
Evolve Audit
Use after evolve-build has produced build-report.md. Validates the build via four parallel sub-auditors (eval-replay, lint, regression, build-quality) and produces ALL-PASS verdict. Adversarial mode default-on per CLAUDE.md.
Evolve Build
Use after evolve-tdd has written RED tests and the contract is in team-context.md. Implements the minimum code to turn RED tests GREEN. Runs in a worktree with single-writer invariant.
Evolve Intent
Pre-Scout intent capture phase. Structures vague user goals into intent.md before any subagent budget is spent. Opt-in via EVOLVEREQUIREINTENT=1.
Evolve Loop
Use when the user invokes /evolve-loop or asks to run autonomous improvement cycles, self-evolving development, compound discovery, or multi-cycle code improvement with research, build, audit, and learning phases
Evolve Plan Review
Use when scout-report.md exists and TDD/Build hasn't started yet. Runs four lenses (CEO, Eng, Design, Security) in parallel on the task list and produces a verdict (PROCEED, REVISE, ABORT) before code is written. Catches misaligned plans before they cost cycles.
Evolve Retro
Use after evolve-ship completes. Three sub-reflectors (instinct, gene, failure) run in parallel to extract lessons, update gene pool, and analyze any failures. Off the latency-critical path.
Evolve Ship
Use after evolve-audit returns Verdict PASS. Atomic git commit + tag + ledger update. Single-writer; cannot fan-out.
Evolve Spec
Use when starting a new evolve-loop cycle and the cycle goal is ambiguous or only described as a one-line objective. Generates a structured specification before any code is written. Surfaces assumptions explicitly.
Evolve TDD
Use when the plan-review verdict is PROCEED (or plan-review is disabled) and code has not yet been written. Writes RED tests first, defining the contract Builder must satisfy. The mandatory hop before any implementation.
Golang Test Review
Use when reviewing Go test code (new or changed test.go files, test harnesses, fixtures, or test tooling) for a Go-test-expert pass — behavior-over-surface, determinism, parallel-safety, build-tag correctness, and harness reuse. Complements the general code-reviewer with test-specific rigor.
Inspirer
Use when the user invokes /inspirer or asks to brainstorm creatively, think outside the box, explore unconventional approaches, break out of stagnation, or generate research-backed ideas with provocation lenses
Phase Create
Use when the user (or the advisor) wants to design and register a NEW optional pipeline phase conversationally — "add a phase that does X". Interviews for goal-type, trigger signal, report sections, and verdict; synthesizes a phase.json + persona; registers them via evolve phases create; self-corrects from the command's JSON envelope. The Go binary is the single enforcement point, so this flow works from any LLM CLI.
Security Review Scored
Security-focused code review that emits a numeric composite score (0.0–1.0) suitable for the evolve-loop Builder self-review convergence loop
Verify Release
Use when the user invokes /verify-release or asks to check whether a release has propagated, whether the marketplace is up to date, or whether installed plugins reflect the latest version. Wraps scripts/release/marketplace-poll.sh for standalone post-publish verification.
Quick start
- Choose your skills. Select individual skills above, or choose the entire pack.
- Copy the install prompt. Use Copy install prompt above the list.
- Send it to your agent. Paste into your coding agent’s chat. Your agent reviews the source and guides the setup.
Try it with your agent
After installation, start with a request like:
Use the Adversarial Testing skill to help with my task.
Ask me for the context you need before getting started.Requirements & license
- A coding agent that can access your project files and install skills.
- Your agent checks each skill’s instructions, dependencies, and permissions during setup.
- Reported license for the skills shown: MIT. The author’s terms apply.