Research & Code Review Skills

Run the full writing-quality pipeline for a LaTeX paper project: lint, auto-fix preview or apply, citation verification, and aggregated reporting. Use this when the user wants a submission-readiness check, a one-command writing QA pass, or a structured report summarizing lint and bibliography health.

Route a natural-language research request to the right Hypo-Research workflow. Use this when the user is unsure whether they need check, review, read, search, ideation, project management, or another expert skill. Can execute conservative safe paths with explicit inputs.

Check the structural quality of a LaTeX paper project. Use this whenever the user wants to lint, review, normalize, or auto-fix LaTeX structure issues: labels, refs, floats, citations, table environments, spacing, BibTeX fields, title case, or abbreviation expansion. Run the stats extractor first, let the script collect objective facts, then apply Agent judgment for abbreviation and title-case recommendations, and optionally patch auto-fixable issues.

Ingest academic PDFs into structured read artifacts, render outlines, and extract heuristic evidence cards for methods, datasets, figures, and claims. Use this when the user wants to read, summarize, inspect, or deep-read a PDF.

Aggregate Codex skill bundle for academic literature search, screening, citation traversal, research ideation, experiment planning, LaTeX lint/fix, bibliography verification, polishing, translation, and one-command paper checks.

Verify whether BibTeX references are real and whether their metadata is correct. Use this whenever the user wants to validate a .bib file, detect hallucinated references, check DOI/title/year/venue/author consistency, or confirm that cited papers actually exist on Semantic Scholar and OpenAlex. Run the verification script first to collect objective metadata evidence, then let the Agent judge whether citation context in the .tex file accurately describes the paper.