AI Agent & Automation Workflows

Privacy-first Business Legal Radar workflow for interviewing a user, discovering current Legalcode coverage, drafting local watch targets, creating local watchbook/state files, and setting up Codex or Claude Code recurring automations without storing watch logic in Legalcode.

Build defensible litigation chronologies from document corpora using a dual-path multi-agent pipeline. Process PDFs, Word documents, emails, images, and other evidence formats at scale — converting to markdown, extracting dates, events, entities, and relationships using Claude Haiku workers in parallel, validating sequences with Sonnet, and synthesizing final timelines with Opus. Supports two execution paths: (1) Claude Code CLI scripts (claude -p --model haiku) for maximum throughput on large corpora, and (2) in-skill sub-agent fallback via the Task tool when CLI is unavailable. Produces citation-linked master timelines, issue timelines, entity timelines, deadline calendars, and court-ready outputs (FRCP Rule 56 statements, proposed findings of fact) across jurisdictions. Handles 10K+ document corpora with automatic chunking, deduplication, privilege screening, protective order designations, and conflict resolution.

Review contracts against your organization's negotiation playbook — flag deviations, generate confidence-scored redlines, and produce an auditable analysis with business impact assessment. Use when reviewing vendor contracts, customer agreements, SaaS agreements, professional services contracts, licenses, partnerships, procurement agreements, or any commercial agreement requiring clause-by-clause analysis against standard positions. Jurisdiction-agnostic with localization markers for any governing law. Supports playbook-based or general-standard review.

Draft objective IRAC/CREAC-structured legal research memoranda with balanced risk assessment, calibrated probability language, and Bluebook/OSCOLA/AGLC citation frameworks. Use when drafting internal predictive research memos, litigation risk assessment memos, deal advisory memos, regulatory compliance memos, or board-ready executive summaries. Produces Glass Box audit-trailed memoranda across US (federal and state), England & Wales, and Australia jurisdictions. Covers issue framing, rule synthesis from statutory and case authority, counterargument steelmanning, probability-weighted conclusions, privilege marking, and mandatory citation verification. Distinguishes settled law from open questions requiring judicial interpretation. Supports multi-issue memos with separate Questions Presented.

Screen and triage incoming NDAs — classify as GREEN (standard approval), YELLOW (counsel review), or RED (significant issues) with confidence-scored, auditable analysis. Use when a new NDA arrives from sales, business development, or a counterparty, when assessing NDA risk level before signature, when deciding whether an NDA needs full counsel review, or when routing NDAs through an in-house legal workflow. Jurisdiction-agnostic with localization markers for any governing law. Supports playbook-based or general-standard screening. Produces a structured triage report with Glass Box audit trail.

Analyze statutes, acts, and regulations section by section — deconstruct structure, parse definitions, classify operative verbs, map exceptions and conditions, assess penalty tiers, determine authority boundaries, flag interpretive ambiguities, and identify implementation consequences. Use when a lawyer, compliance officer, policy analyst, or legal researcher needs to understand what a statute actually says and requires — as distinct from verifying that a citation is in-force (use legalcode-legislation-verification for that). Covers primary legislation, delegated legislation (statutory instruments, regulations, ordinances, executive orders, decrees), and secondary regulatory frameworks. Jurisdiction-agnostic with [JURISDICTION-SPECIFIC] markers; supports common law and civil law systems.

Use to review an Icelandic act transposing an EEA-incorporated EU instrument for gold-plating (gullhúðun) — transposition over-reach. Useful for preparing a samráðsgátt umsögn, briefing utanríkismálanefnd, advising whether a stricter Icelandic rule traces to the directive or a domestic add-on, drafting a breytingartillaga, preparing an ESA complaint, or auditing for systemic over-implementation. Triggers on "check this act for gold-plating", "find gullhúðun in lög nr. X/Y", "compare this transposition to the directive", "did Iceland go further than required", or "build a Gullhúðunarskýrsla". Performs section-by-section comparison against the authentic Icelandic translation, traces each divergence through the Alþingi pre-law record via the Legalcode Pro MCP, classifies severity (Davidson Five + Pattern G30) with counter-argument stress test, and produces a Gullhúðunarskýrsla plus optional remediation breytingafrumvarp.