Research & Analysis Workflows

Show all InferenceOS features, MCP tools, skills, and CLI commands available to the user.

Generate a compact workspace briefing via InferenceOS to start sessions with near-zero tokens instead of replaying full context.

Live InferenceOS token economics dashboard — Apple-styled visual widget showing savings, routing, circuit health, and…

Track tasks persistently across Claude Code sessions using InferenceOS native task orchestration.

Systematic token-saving strategies using InferenceOS local context, caching, and session persistence to reduce Claude Code subscription usage.

General-purpose web research and evidence synthesis. Decomposes any question into precise sub-questions, searches systematically, evaluates source quality, cross-checks claims across multiple sources, and returns structured answers with inline citations and explicit uncertainty language. Use for any factual, comparative, or recommendation task that requires external evidence. Use this skill whenever the user asks for research, sources, comparisons, rankings, evidence-backed recommendations, or any task that requires synthesizing information from multiple external sources — even if they don't explicitly say "research".

Specialist evidence synthesis for medical, public health, and epidemiological questions. Frames questions using PICO/PECO, prioritises systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and GRADE-based guidelines, interprets study design and risk of bias, and reports findings with calibrated certainty language. Never provides clinical advice, diagnosis, or individual treatment recommendations. Use this skill whenever the question involves health interventions, risk factors, prognosis, diagnostics, screening, epidemiological patterns, disease burden, population health, clinical practice guidelines, health policy, public health recommendations, study design appraisal, causal inference, or bias in biomedical research — even if the user doesn't explicitly frame it as a medical question.

Evidence synthesis for policy, economics, and social science questions. Integrates quantitative and qualitative evidence, maps major schools of thought and their evidential bases, separates descriptive findings from normative claims, and foregrounds equity, heterogeneity, and contextual transferability. Use this skill whenever the question involves public policy, governance, regulation, institutional reform, economic impacts, cost-effectiveness, labour markets, inequality, fiscal policy, education, social protection, international development, complex social programmes, political economy, power dynamics, or distributional questions — even if the user frames it as a simple factual query.