Enforces five non-negotiable quality pillars that counter the shortcuts an agent takes under training pressure: complete reporting (show ALL items, never filter unilaterally), verification (no claim of works/done/exists without a tool-call receipt in the same turn), thoroughness (every acceptance criterion individually verified; docs ship with the change), enrichment ('improve' means add capability, never trim), and anti-shortcut (exhaust deterministic lookup before guessing; findings demand action, not just filing). Use when reviewing any enumerated output for completeness, when an agent claims something works without evidence, when marking a task done, when asked to 'improve' or 'clean up' anything, or when findings are filed without being acted on. Do NOT use for the deep explanatory model of WHY completeness fails or the step-level execution mechanics (use methodical), for the cross-domain quality-standards catalog like OWASP/WCAG/SOLID (use best-practice), for scoring whether a result is good enough (use evaluation), or for compression after a complete enumeration exists (use summarization).
Install with
Claude CodeCodexCursorGitHub CopilotGemini CLI
Supported by the Atlas install prompt. Skill-specific requirements vary.
Skill stats
Skills1CategorySecurityStars0
About this skill
Enforces five non-negotiable quality pillars that counter the shortcuts an agent takes under training pressure: complete reporting (show ALL items, never filter unilaterally), verification (no claim of works/done/exists without a tool-call receipt in the same turn), thoroughness (every acceptance criterion individually verified; docs ship with the change), enrichment ('improve' means add capability, never trim), and anti-shortcut (exhaust deterministic lookup before guessing; findings demand action, not just filing). Use when reviewing any enumerated output for completeness, when an agent claims something works without evidence, when marking a task done, when asked to 'improve' or 'clean up' anything, or when findings are filed without being acted on. Do NOT use for the deep explanatory model of WHY completeness fails or the step-level execution mechanics (use methodical), for the cross-domain quality-standards catalog like OWASP/WCAG/SOLID (use best-practice), for scoring whether a result is good enough (use evaluation), or for compression after a complete enumeration exists (use summarization).
Quick start
Copy the install prompt. Use the green button above this README.
Send it to your agent. Paste it into your coding agent’s chat and send.
Review the setup. Your agent checks the skill’s instructions, requirements, and installation scope.
Enforces five non-negotiable quality pillars that counter the shortcuts an agent takes under training pressure: complete reporting (show ALL items, never filter unilaterally), verification (no claim of works/done/exists without a tool-call receipt in the same turn), thoroughness (every acceptance criterion individually verified; docs ship with the change), enrichment ('improve' means add capability, never trim), and anti-shortcut (exhaust deterministic lookup before guessing; findings demand action, not just filing). Use when reviewing any enumerated output for completeness, when an agent claims something works without evidence, when marking a task done, when asked to 'improve' or 'clean up' anything, or when findings are filed without being acted on. Do NOT use for the deep explanatory model of WHY completeness fails or the step-level execution mechanics (use `methodical`), for the cross-domain quality-standards catalog like OWASP/WCAG/SOLID (use `best-practice`), for scoring whether a result is good enough (use `evaluation`), or for compression after a complete enumeration exists (use `summarization`).
About this listing
Category
Security
Reported license
CC-BY-4.0
Listing language (estimated)
English
Review status
Not individually reviewed
Agent compatibility
Atlas installation supports Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor. Skill-specific dependencies and features are checked during setup.