Orchestrate a multi-agent adversarial review panel where several Claude Code subagents with different perspectives independently review a piece of work, debate with each other, reach (or fail to reach) consensus, then a supreme judge renders the final verdict. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a "review panel", "multi-agent review", "adversarial review", "have agents debate this", "review with multiple perspectives", "panel review", "get different opinions on this code/plan/doc", or invokes /agent-review-panel. Also trigger when a user says things like "I want thorough feedback from different angles", "stress-test this design", "red team this", "get a second (third, fourth) opinion", "fresh eyes on this", "multiple reviewers", "devil's advocate perspective", "every angle covered", "I want agents to argue pros and cons", "independently evaluate", "critical look from security and performance angles", "high-stakes — cover every angle", or "debate the pros and cons". This skill is specifically about launching multiple reviewer agents with distinct personas who discuss and debate — NOT for single-reviewer code review, quick sanity checks, bug fixes, deployment tasks, addressing existing PR comments, skill improvement, peer review, code explanation, or writing tests. Supports "deep research mode" when user says "deep review", "thorough review", "research review", or passes "deep" to /agent-review-panel — adds web research for domain best practices before launching reviewers. Supports "multi-run union mode" when user says "multi-run review", "run N times and merge", "run twice", "run 3 times", or "maximum coverage review" — repeats the panel with rotated persona sets and merges results with stability scoring. Supports "data flow trace tiers" (Standard/Thorough/Exhaustive) when user says "thorough review", "exhaustive review", "trace everything", or "catch all bugs" — dedicates a pre-review phase to tracing data through critical paths and flagging composition/seam bugs.
Install with
Claude CodeCodexCursorGitHub CopilotGemini CLI
Supported by the Atlas install prompt. Skill-specific requirements vary.
Skill stats
Skills1CategorySecurityStars0
About this skill
Orchestrate a multi-agent adversarial review panel where several Claude Code subagents with different perspectives independently review a piece of work, debate with each other, reach (or fail to reach) consensus, then a supreme judge renders the final verdict. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a "review panel", "multi-agent review", "adversarial review", "have agents debate this", "review with multiple perspectives", "panel review", "get different opinions on this code/plan/doc", or invokes /agent-review-panel. Also trigger when a user says things like "I want thorough feedback from different angles", "stress-test this design", "red team this", "get a second (third, fourth) opinion", "fresh eyes on this", "multiple reviewers", "devil's advocate perspective", "every angle covered", "I want agents to argue pros and cons", "independently evaluate", "critical look from security and performance angles", "high-stakes — cover every angle", or "debate the pros and cons". This skill is specifically about launching multiple reviewer agents with distinct personas who discuss and debate — NOT for single-reviewer code review, quick sanity checks, bug fixes, deployment tasks, addressing existing PR comments, skill improvement, peer review, code explanation, or writing tests. Supports "deep research mode" when user says "deep review", "thorough review", "research review", or passes "deep" to /agent-review-panel — adds web research for domain best practices before launching reviewers. Supports "multi-run union mode" when user says "multi-run review", "run N times and merge", "run twice", "run 3 times", or "maximum coverage review" — repeats the panel with rotated persona sets and merges results with stability scoring. Supports "data flow trace tiers" (Standard/Thorough/Exhaustive) when user says "thorough review", "exhaustive review", "trace everything", or "catch all bugs" — dedicates a pre-review phase to tracing data through critical paths and flagging composition/seam bugs.
Quick start
Copy the install prompt. Use the green button above this README.
Send it to your agent. Paste it into your coding agent’s chat and send.
Review the setup. Your agent checks the skill’s instructions, requirements, and installation scope.
Orchestrate a multi-agent adversarial review panel where several Claude Code subagents with different perspectives independently review a piece of work, debate with each other, reach (or fail to reach) consensus, then a supreme judge renders the final verdict. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a "review panel", "multi-agent review", "adversarial review", "have agents debate this", "review with multiple perspectives", "panel review", "get different opinions on this code/plan/doc", or invokes /agent-review-panel. Also trigger when a user says things like "I want thorough feedback from different angles", "stress-test this design", "red team this", "get a second (third, fourth) opinion", "fresh eyes on this", "multiple reviewers", "devil's advocate perspective", "every angle covered", "I want agents to argue pros and cons", "independently evaluate", "critical look from security and performance angles", "high-stakes — cover every angle", or "debate the pros and cons". This skill is specifically about launching multiple reviewer agents with distinct personas who discuss and debate — NOT for single-reviewer code review, quick sanity checks, bug fixes, deployment tasks, addressing existing PR comments, skill improvement, peer review, code explanation, or writing tests. Supports "deep research mode" when user says "deep review", "thorough review", "research review", or passes "deep" to /agent-review-panel — adds web research for domain best practices before launching reviewers. Supports "multi-run union mode" when user says "multi-run review", "run N times and merge", "run twice", "run 3 times", or "maximum coverage review" — repeats the panel with rotated persona sets and merges results with stability scoring. Supports "data flow trace tiers" (Standard/Thorough/Exhaustive) when user says "thorough review", "exhaustive review", "trace everything", or "catch all bugs" — dedicates a pre-review phase to tracing data through critical paths and flagging composition/seam bugs.
About this listing
Category
Security
Reported license
MIT
Listing language (estimated)
English
Review status
Not individually reviewed
Agent compatibility
Atlas installation supports Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor. Skill-specific dependencies and features are checked during setup.
Claude Code
Codex
Cursor
GitHub Copilot
Gemini CLI