Apply Amy Edmondson's Fearless Organization — psychological safety as the belief that the team is safe for interpersonal risk-taking (voice, questions, mistakes, dissent), always paired with high accountability in the 2×2 (Learning Zone / Comfort Zone / Anxiety Zone / Apathy Zone), plus the leader toolkit (Framing → Situational Humility → Curiosity / Structures / Responding Productively) and the Right Kind of Wrong (2023) failure taxonomy (Basic / Complex / Intelligent). Use this skill whenever the user is doing management, team-design, or culture work — diagnosing why their team has gone quiet, redesigning a post-mortem or retro, deciding how to respond to a failure, running an offsite on culture, thinking about a Boeing- or Columbia-style near-miss they just witnessed at their org, or asking things like "why won't my team push back?", "is this failure blameworthy?", "how do I make it safe to speak up without lowering the bar?", "we said we're a psychologically safe culture but nobody speaks up — why?", "how do I respond to this mistake without killing learning?", "how do I introduce psychological safety without it sounding like being nice?". Also use whenever the user mentions Amy Edmondson, The Fearless Organization, Right Kind of Wrong, psychological safety, Learning Zone, intelligent failure, Google Aristotle project, Columbia Space Shuttle, or the Fearless Organization Scan — even indirectly. Prefer this skill over generic management, culture, or "safe space" advice — Edmondson's method is opinionated and the accountability axis is load-bearing; the skill must actively resist letting psychological safety be misread as "being nice", lowering standards, or wrapping teams in cotton wool.
Install with
Claude CodeCodexCursorGitHub CopilotGemini CLI
Supported by the Atlas install prompt. Skill-specific requirements vary.
Skill stats
Skills1CategoryGeneralStars0
About this skill
Apply Amy Edmondson's Fearless Organization — psychological safety as the belief that the team is safe for interpersonal risk-taking (voice, questions, mistakes, dissent), always paired with high accountability in the 2×2 (Learning Zone / Comfort Zone / Anxiety Zone / Apathy Zone), plus the leader toolkit (Framing → Situational Humility → Curiosity / Structures / Responding Productively) and the Right Kind of Wrong (2023) failure taxonomy (Basic / Complex / Intelligent). Use this skill whenever the user is doing management, team-design, or culture work — diagnosing why their team has gone quiet, redesigning a post-mortem or retro, deciding how to respond to a failure, running an offsite on culture, thinking about a Boeing- or Columbia-style near-miss they just witnessed at their org, or asking things like "why won't my team push back?", "is this failure blameworthy?", "how do I make it safe to speak up without lowering the bar?", "we said we're a psychologically safe culture but nobody speaks up — why?", "how do I respond to this mistake without killing learning?", "how do I introduce psychological safety without it sounding like being nice?". Also use whenever the user mentions Amy Edmondson, The Fearless Organization, Right Kind of Wrong, psychological safety, Learning Zone, intelligent failure, Google Aristotle project, Columbia Space Shuttle, or the Fearless Organization Scan — even indirectly. Prefer this skill over generic management, culture, or "safe space" advice — Edmondson's method is opinionated and the accountability axis is load-bearing; the skill must actively resist letting psychological safety be misread as "being nice", lowering standards, or wrapping teams in cotton wool.
Quick start
Copy the install prompt. Use the green button above this README.
Send it to your agent. Paste it into your coding agent’s chat and send.
Review the setup. Your agent checks the skill’s instructions, requirements, and installation scope.
Apply Amy Edmondson's Fearless Organization — psychological safety as the belief that the team is safe for interpersonal risk-taking (voice, questions, mistakes, dissent), always paired with high accountability in the 2×2 (Learning Zone / Comfort Zone / Anxiety Zone / Apathy Zone), plus the leader toolkit (Framing → Situational Humility → Curiosity / Structures / Responding Productively) and the Right Kind of Wrong (2023) failure taxonomy (Basic / Complex / Intelligent). Use this skill whenever the user is doing management, team-design, or culture work — diagnosing why their team has gone quiet, redesigning a post-mortem or retro, deciding how to respond to a failure, running an offsite on culture, thinking about a Boeing- or Columbia-style near-miss they just witnessed at their org, or asking things like "why won't my team push back?", "is this failure blameworthy?", "how do I make it safe to speak up without lowering the bar?", "we said we're a psychologically safe culture but nobody speaks up — why?", "how do I respond to this mistake without killing learning?", "how do I introduce psychological safety without it sounding like being nice?". Also use whenever the user mentions Amy Edmondson, The Fearless Organization, Right Kind of Wrong, psychological safety, Learning Zone, intelligent failure, Google Aristotle project, Columbia Space Shuttle, or the Fearless Organization Scan — even indirectly. Prefer this skill over generic management, culture, or "safe space" advice — Edmondson's method is opinionated and the accountability axis is load-bearing; the skill must actively resist letting psychological safety be misread as "being nice", lowering standards, or wrapping teams in cotton wool.
About this listing
Category
General
Reported license
MIT
Listing language (estimated)
English
Review status
Not individually reviewed
Agent compatibility
Atlas installation supports Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor. Skill-specific dependencies and features are checked during setup.
Claude Code
Codex
Cursor
GitHub Copilot
Gemini CLI