Use when reviewing a data analysis, notebook, script, model, or result — your own before you ship it, a colleague's before it's published, or one handed to you to "check" or "sanity-check" — in R, Julia, or Python. Hunts specifically for the silent-failure classes that pass code review but produce wrong answers: unchecked joins, leakage, fished specifications, unreconciled totals, undefined metrics, and identification gaps. Use when the user says "review this analysis", "can you check my notebook", "does this look right", "sanity-check these numbers", "before I send this", or is about to accept someone else's analytical result. Also use when receiving review feedback on your own analysis, to verify the critique rather than reflexively agreeing.
Install with
Claude CodeCodexCursorGitHub CopilotGemini CLI
Supported by the Atlas install prompt. Skill-specific requirements vary.
Skill stats
Skills1CategoryData & analyticsStars0
About this skill
Use when reviewing a data analysis, notebook, script, model, or result — your own before you ship it, a colleague's before it's published, or one handed to you to "check" or "sanity-check" — in R, Julia, or Python. Hunts specifically for the silent-failure classes that pass code review but produce wrong answers: unchecked joins, leakage, fished specifications, unreconciled totals, undefined metrics, and identification gaps. Use when the user says "review this analysis", "can you check my notebook", "does this look right", "sanity-check these numbers", "before I send this", or is about to accept someone else's analytical result. Also use when receiving review feedback on your own analysis, to verify the critique rather than reflexively agreeing.
Quick start
Copy the install prompt. Use the green button above this README.
Send it to your agent. Paste it into your coding agent’s chat and send.
Review the setup. Your agent checks the skill’s instructions, requirements, and installation scope.
Use when reviewing a data analysis, notebook, script, model, or result — your own before you ship it, a colleague's before it's published, or one handed to you to "check" or "sanity-check" — in R, Julia, or Python. Hunts specifically for the silent-failure classes that pass code review but produce wrong answers: unchecked joins, leakage, fished specifications, unreconciled totals, undefined metrics, and identification gaps. Use when the user says "review this analysis", "can you check my notebook", "does this look right", "sanity-check these numbers", "before I send this", or is about to accept someone else's analytical result. Also use when receiving review feedback on your own analysis, to verify the critique rather than reflexively agreeing.
About this listing
Category
Data & analytics
Reported license
MIT
Listing language (estimated)
English
Review status
Not individually reviewed
Agent compatibility
Atlas installation supports Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor. Skill-specific dependencies and features are checked during setup.