Agent Automation & Workflow Planning Skills

Orchestrate a multi-agent adversarial review panel where several Claude Code subagents with different perspectives independently review a piece of work, debate with each other, reach (or fail to reach) consensus, then a supreme judge renders the final verdict. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a "review panel", "multi-agent review", "adversarial review", "have agents debate this", "review with multiple perspectives", "panel review", "get different opinions on this code/plan/doc", or invokes /agent-review-panel. Also trigger when a user says things like "I want thorough feedback from different angles", "stress-test this design", "red team this", "get a second (third, fourth) opinion", "fresh eyes on this", "multiple reviewers", "devil's advocate perspective", "every angle covered", "I want agents to argue pros and cons", "independently evaluate", "critical look from security and performance angles", "high-stakes — cover every angle", or "debate the pros and cons". This skill is specifically about launching multiple reviewer agents with distinct personas who discuss and debate — NOT for single-reviewer code review, quick sanity checks, bug fixes, deployment tasks, addressing existing PR comments, skill improvement, peer review, code explanation, or writing tests. Supports "deep research mode" when user says "deep review", "thorough review", "research review", or passes "deep" to /agent-review-panel — adds web research for domain best practices before launching reviewers. Supports "multi-run union mode" when user says "multi-run review", "run N times and merge", "run twice", "run 3 times", or "maximum coverage review" — repeats the panel with rotated persona sets and merges results with stability scoring. Supports "data flow trace tiers" (Standard/Thorough/Exhaustive) when user says "thorough review", "exhaustive review", "trace everything", or "catch all bugs" — dedicates a pre-review phase to tracing data through critical paths and flagging composition/seam bugs.

Integrate structured review panel findings into an implementation plan document. Takes output from agent-review-panel (or any structured review with severity-rated findings) and cross-references each finding against the plan, classifies it into an action category, applies concrete edits, and produces a traceability summary. Trigger when the user says "update the plan with review findings", "incorporate review feedback into the plan", "integrate review results", "apply review recommendations to the plan", "cross-reference review output against the plan", "merge review findings into the implementation plan", "what needs to change in the plan based on the review", "take the review panel output and update my plan", "reconcile the review feedback with the current plan", or invokes /plan-review-integrator. Does NOT trigger for running a review panel (use agent-review-panel), writing a plan from scratch, general code review, summarizing review findings without applying them, or brainstorming implementation approaches.